2.3 Compare the difference between aerobic and anaerobic training for individuals and group sports, including differentiated training programs and contemporary methods of training
About the dot point
Aerobic and anaerobic training are two different ways the body supplies energy to working muscles during exercise, and each produces different performance adaptations. Aerobic training uses oxygen to produce ATP at a steady, sustainable rate, which supports endurance and helps athletes recover between repeated efforts. Anaerobic training supplies energy quickly through the ATP-PCr and glycolytic systems during short, high-intensity bouts, developing qualities such as speed, power, and tolerance to fatigue.
How to approach it
In this dot point, the directive verb is compare, so you must place aerobic training and anaerobic training side by side and show both similarities and differences using the same points of comparison each time. That means comparing them on a consistent basis, such as intensity thresholds, work and rest patterns, energy system emphasis, adaptations, and how they are applied in individual and group sports, including how programs are differentiated and how contemporary methods are used.
1. Training thresholds
To compare training properly, you need to understand intensity as a training threshold or zone, not just “easy” versus “hard”. A threshold is the intensity where the body starts to respond in a specific way. Over time, this leads to specific adaptations.
A practical way to estimate intensity is by using maximal heart rate (MHR):
- MHR estimate: 220 minus age = 100% (beats per minute).
For most 16 to 18-year-olds, this gives an MHR estimate of about 202–204 bpm, which can then be used to set heart rate zones.
Example: Calculating training heart-rate targets for a 17-year-old
A 17-year-old has an estimated MHR of 220 − 17 = 203 bpm.
• 60% MHR (lower aerobic): 0.60 × 203 = 122 bpm
• 70% MHR (steady aerobic anchor): 0.70 × 203 = 142 bpm
• 80% MHR (upper aerobic): 0.80 × 203 = 162 bpm
• 85% MHR (near anaerobic threshold anchor): 0.85 × 203 = 173 bpm
• 95% MHR (very high intensity): 0.95 × 203 = 193 bpm
These targets help match the session to the intended outcome. Lower aerobic work builds base endurance and recovery. Higher intensities (closer to 80–85% MHR) are more likely to build your ability to hold faster efforts before fatigue rises.
1.1 Key intensity markers
Heart rate zones help you plan aerobic and anaerobic training. Aerobic work usually happens at 60–80% MHR, and harder aerobic work often goes up to 70–85% MHR.
Anaerobic intervals are usually at or above the anaerobic threshold, especially when the work periods are longer and rest is short.
A useful guide is that the anaerobic threshold is usually around 85% of maximal heart rate (MHR), though this is different for different people. This is important because it’s close to the point where you can’t keep going at a steady pace comfortably anymore.
Because heart-rate percentages are just estimates, coaches often check intensity in other ways too. They use Rate of perceived exertion (RPE) (for example, asking if it feels “hard but controlled”), and they watch whether you can repeat intervals at the same speed with good technique. If your speed drops a lot or your technique gets messy, the intensity is probably too high for what that session is trying to achieve.
- Rate of perceived exertion (RPE) measures internal load when heart rate is unreliable, such as very short sprints (heart rate lags behind effort) or in heat (heart rate can be higher at the same pace). A common school-friendly scale is 0–10.
- Lactate threshold is the highest intensity you can sustain before lactate and related fatigue markers rise quickly. Training near this threshold helps you hold faster speeds aerobically before fatigue increases.
- Talk test is a quick field guide. If you can speak in full sentences, intensity is usually steady aerobic. If you can only speak in short phrases, intensity is often closer to threshold or above.
Example: Two Year 12 AFL midfielders complete 4-minute running intervals. Player A holds a steady pace at RPE 7/10 and can speak in short phrases. Player B hits RPE 9/10 early and slows across reps. The same session creates a different training effect and recovery cost, so programming may need differentiation.
2. Aerobic training
Aerobic training is sustained exercise at low to moderate intensity, where oxygen delivery matches muscle demand and ATP production is mainly aerobic. It is the base for endurance sports and is important in many team sports because it supports recovery between high-intensity efforts.
Aerobic work is commonly performed at an intensity that feels controlled and sustainable, often around 60–80% MHR.
2.1 Aerobic adaptations
Regular aerobic training improves endurance performance through adaptations such as:
- increased stroke volume and cardiac output
- lower resting and submaximal heart rate
- increased capillary density in working muscles
- increased mitochondrial density and oxidative enzyme activity
- improved fat oxidation, which helps spare glycogen
- improved lactate threshold and, for many athletes, improved VO₂ max
Example: A netball centre with a higher lactate threshold can maintain match pace for longer and recover faster between repeated high-intensity passages.
2.2 Aerobic training methods
Aerobic fitness can be developed using different methods. The best method depends on the sport, the time of year, and the athlete’s needs.
|
Method |
What it is |
Key feature |
Example |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Continuous training |
Steady effort without rest intervals. |
In many practical models, around 20 minutes is the minimum used to classify a session as continuous. |
A surf lifesaving athlete completes 45 minutes of steady swimming to build aerobic base fitness. |
|
Fartlek training |
Changes pace during a continuous session, mixing steady running with short surges. |
Unstructured changes in speed to reflect changing match tempo. |
A soccer player alternates between 2 minutes steady running and 30 seconds faster running to reflect match tempo. |
|
Aerobic interval training (long intervals) |
Repeated efforts (often 2–5 minutes) with structured recovery, often near threshold intensity. |
Controlled work and recovery to build strong aerobic capacity near threshold. |
A 1500 m runner completes 5 × 4 minutes at a strong, controlled pace with 2 minutes easy jog recovery. |
|
Circuit training (cardio-focused) |
Can be aerobic when work is continuous, loads are light to moderate, and rest is short. |
Keeps heart rate elevated while rotating through stations. |
A class completes skipping, step-ups, bodyweight squats and rowing stations, moving quickly to keep heart rate elevated. |
Continuous aerobic work can also be done using lower-impact options such as swimming or cycling, and may include brisk walking.
3. Anaerobic training
Anaerobic training is high-intensity exercise done in short bursts or intervals where ATP demand rises quickly. Energy supply is emphasised through the ATP-PCr system and glycolytic (lactic acid) system.
These sessions are designed to improve speed, power, and the ability to repeat high-intensity efforts.
Anaerobic work is usually brief, often less than 2 minutes per work bout, and needs planned recovery because maximal effort cannot be held for long.
3.1 Anaerobic adaptations
Anaerobic training supports high-intensity performance through adaptations including:
- increased intramuscular ATP and PCr stores
- improved anaerobic enzyme activity to speed up glycolysis
- improved buffering capacity and tolerance to fatigue
- greater Type II (fast-twitch) fibre contribution and, when resistance training is included, hypertrophy
- improved neural recruitment, increasing rate of force development
Example: A 100 m sprinter improves start and acceleration because sprint training and heavy strength work increase neural recruitment and the ability to apply force quickly.
3.2 Anaerobic training methods
Anaerobic training includes methods that change the work and recovery to target different outcomes.
Anaerobic interval training (anaerobic intervals) uses maximal or near-maximal efforts with recovery. Work duration can be organised to emphasise different demands:
- Short anaerobic intervals (often <25 seconds) strongly emphasise ATP-PCr contributions.
- Medium anaerobic intervals (about 25 seconds to 1 minute) strongly challenge the glycolytic system.
- Long anaerobic intervals (about 1–2 minutes) increase glycolytic demand, with more aerobic support during work and recovery.
|
Interval type |
Typical work duration |
Typical rest duration |
Work:rest ratio |
Typical reps/sets |
Typical % speed target |
Typical % MHR during work* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Short anaerobic intervals (ATP-PCr emphasis) |
5 secs |
40 secs |
1:4 to 1:10 |
6–12 reps, 1–3 sets |
95–100% of maximum sprint speed |
Often not reliable during the effort; session commonly trends 85–95% overall |
|
Medium anaerobic intervals (glycolytic emphasis) |
20 secs |
60 secs |
1:3 to 1:6 |
4–10 reps, 1–3 sets |
90–95% of maximum sprint speed |
Commonly 85–95%, depending on recovery and repetition quality |
|
Long anaerobic intervals (high glycolytic demand with more aerobic support) |
60 secs |
90 seconds |
1:2 to 1:4 |
3–6 reps, 1–2 sets |
85–92% of maximum sprint speed |
Often 90–100% by later reps if recovery is incomplete |
*For very short sprints, heart rate lags behind effort, so coaches use speed, Rate of perceived exertion (RPE), and repeated-effort quality as the main checks.
Because fatigue reduces sprint quality, recovery is changed depending on the goal. If the aim is maximal speed and technique, rest is longer. If the aim is tolerance to repeated high-intensity work, rest is shorter and more incomplete.
Example: A basketball guard performs 10 × 15-second hard court sprints with 45 seconds recovery to improve repeat sprint capacity that reflects game demands.
In team sports, anaerobic performance is also trained through repeat-sprint conditioning and neuromuscular methods (strength and plyometrics), not just running intervals. For instance:
- Repeat sprint training uses very short maximal sprints with enough rest to keep speed high.
- Resistance training develops force and power to support acceleration, jumping, tackling and changes of direction.
- Plyometrics develop explosive power through stretch-shortening cycle movements.
4. Comparing training for individuals and group sports
The directive verb Compare means you need to identify key similarities and differences, then link them to performance demands. In this dot point, that means showing how aerobic training and anaerobic training are used differently in individual sports and group sports, and explaining why.
4.1 Individual sports
Individual sports often have a more predictable intensity and duration. This allows training to match the exact event more closely.
Endurance events tend to prioritise aerobic development, threshold work and pacing. Sprint and power events tend to prioritise anaerobic power, neuromuscular efficiency and recovery between maximal efforts.
Example: A marathon runner prioritises continuous runs and aerobic intervals. A shot put athlete prioritises maximal strength and explosive power, with minimal aerobic work beyond general conditioning and recovery support.
4.2 Group sports
Most group sports are intermittent. Players combine steady movement with repeated bursts of high intensity. Training needs both a strong aerobic base and high anaerobic capacity.
In group sports, the aerobic system supports:
- sustaining total work rate across a match
- faster recovery between sprints
- maintaining skill and decision-making under fatigue
Anaerobic systems support accelerations, jumps, tackles, rapid changes of direction, and repeated high-intensity passages.
Example: In soccer, a player may jog and reposition for long periods (mainly aerobic), then sprint to press or recover in defence (high anaerobic demand).
Positional demands within team sports
Even within one team, positions have different demands. This changes the balance of aerobic training and anaerobic training needed.
Example: In AFL, midfielders often need higher aerobic capacity for large running volumes, while a key forward may need more emphasis on explosive power and repeat sprints.
5. Differentiated training programs
A differentiated training program changes training variables so each athlete gets the right stimulus based on fitness level, role, injury status, and season phase.
Differentiation matters because the same drill can affect athletes differently. Without differentiation, some athletes under-train, while others over-train and build excess fatigue.
5.1 How training is differentiated
Differentiation usually happens by changing:
- Intensity (pace targets, heart rate zones, Rate of perceived exertion (RPE))
- Volume (total work time, interval count, total distance)
- Work:rest ratios (especially in anaerobic intervals and HIIT)
- Mode (running, cycling, pool conditioning) to manage joint load or injury risk
- Skill integration (conditioning inside game-based drills versus separate conditioning)
Example: In netball, a centre may do extra aerobic intervals, while a goal shooter may do more explosive short sprint work with lower running volume to preserve power.
5.2 Monitoring to support differentiation
Coaches often monitor load and recovery using heart rate, session Rate of perceived exertion (RPE), GPS metrics, and movement quality.
Example: Two rugby league players complete the same shuttle-run HIIT drill. One holds speed and technique at RPE 7/10. The other slows and loses control at RPE 9/10. The second athlete may need reduced volume, longer recovery, or a different conditioning mode.
6. Contemporary methods of training
Contemporary methods of training are widely used because they are time-efficient and can train multiple qualities at once. They are used in both individuals and group sports and can be differentiated by changing work time, rest time, intensity targets, and exercise choice.
6.1 High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)
High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) uses repeated bouts of hard work with planned recovery. It sits in the “very hard” zone where breathing is heavy and speaking is limited to short phrases. In many models, work sits around 80–95% MHR (often above anaerobic threshold), while recovery is much lower so heart rate does not fully drop before the next rep.
Why coaches use HIIT:
- Time-efficient way to build aerobic fitness (including VO₂ max) while also improving repeat-effort ability.
- Fits intermittent sports because it trains “work hard, recover, then go again”.
- Easy to differentiate by adjusting work time, rest time, reps, and speed targets.
Key programming variables to elaborate HIIT properly:
- Work duration: commonly 20 seconds to 4 minutes, depending on whether the focus is more speed-based or more aerobic-threshold based.
- Rest duration: often equal to, or slightly less than, work (incomplete recovery) to maintain a strong cardiovascular stimulus.
- Work:rest ratio: commonly 1:1 to 2:1 for aerobic-focused HIIT.
- Intensity prescription: can be set by %MHR, pace times, or session RPE (typically ~7–9/10 depending on the interval length).
- Quality control: if speed drops substantially across reps, the intensity is likely too high or recovery too short for the intended HIIT outcome.
Sport examples of what HIIT looks like:
- Individual (endurance) sport: a 1500 m runner might use 6 × 2 minutes hard with 1 minute easy jog to push aerobic power while keeping running mechanics controlled.
- Team sport: a soccer squad might use 4 × 4 minutes of high-tempo running with 3 minutes easy movement to build match-running capacity and faster recovery between efforts.
Monitoring HIIT:
- Heart rate is useful because the reps are long enough for HR to rise meaningfully, but it still lags at the start of each rep.
- Coaches often combine HR with RPE, pace consistency, and technique quality.
Example: A school basketball squad completes 10 × 60 seconds hard running with 60–75 seconds easy recovery. Differentiation could include faster athletes running further in 60 seconds, or less-fit athletes completing 8 reps or taking 90 seconds recovery to preserve movement quality.
6.2 Sprint Interval Training (SIT)
Sprint Interval Training (SIT) uses maximal or near-maximal efforts (typically ≤30 seconds) with long recovery (often 2–4 minutes or more) so each sprint stays high quality.
How SIT differs from HIIT:
- HIIT is “very hard” but often controlled.
- SIT is “all-out” or very close to it, so rest must be longer to prevent sprint quality collapsing.
Energy system emphasis:
- SIT strongly stresses the ATP-PCr system at the start of each sprint, with rapid contribution from the glycolytic system as the sprint continues.
- Even though SIT is “anaerobic”, repeated maximal efforts create a large overall oxygen demand, which is why aerobic fitness can still improve.
Key programming variables:
- Work duration: 5–10 seconds (true acceleration/speed), 10–20 seconds (speed endurance), or 20–30 seconds (strong glycolytic stress).
- Rest duration: long enough to restore PCr and keep technique safe, commonly 1:6 to 1:12 (or longer) depending on goals.
- Volume control: total sprint time is usually low. Coaches prioritise quality over quantity.
Monitoring SIT:
- Heart rate is a poor guide during the sprint because it lags behind effort.
- Use sprint time, distance, or speed, plus RPE 9–10 and movement quality (posture, foot contact, arm drive) as key checks.
When SIT is useful:
- Sports with repeated maximal accelerations (e.g. hockey, rugby, basketball).
- When impact needs to be managed (e.g. using a bike or rower), while still chasing maximal-intensity conditioning.
Example: An elite hockey player uses SIT on a stationary bike: 8 × 20 seconds all-out with 3 minutes easy spin. If power output drops sharply, the set is stopped or recovery is extended so quality stays high.
6.3 Comparing HIIT and SIT
|
Aspect |
High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) |
Sprint Interval Training (SIT) |
|---|---|---|
|
Intensity |
Very hard, often around 80–95% MHR, not always maximal |
Maximal or near-maximal sprints, commonly ≤ 30 seconds |
|
Recovery |
Often equal to, or slightly longer than work, may be incomplete |
Longer recovery, often 2–4 minutes, to preserve sprint quality |
|
Primary training outcome |
Strong aerobic gains with meaningful repeat-effort benefits |
Strong anaerobic power gains with rapid aerobic improvements in trained athletes |
|
Best fit |
Broad conditioning for individuals and teams, adaptable across many modes |
Advanced conditioning, power-based athletes, or when maximal sprint stimulus is required with controlled volume |
7. Comparison between aerobic and anaerobic training
When you compare aerobic training and anaerobic training sessions, key differences often include warm-up length, work duration, rest, total workload, and how intensity is monitored.
Aerobic sessions are commonly monitored using heart rate zones because the work is sustained. Anaerobic sessions are often monitored using speed and Rate of perceived exertion (RPE) because short maximal efforts happen too quickly for heart rate to show the true intensity in the moment.
The balance matters because each type supports performance in different ways. Too much aerobic volume can reduce power if explosive work is neglected. Too much anaerobic intensity can reduce the ability to recover between efforts if the aerobic base is under-developed.
7.1 Comparing aerobic vs anaerobic training
|
Aspect |
Aerobic training |
Anaerobic training |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary energy system emphasis |
Aerobic (oxidative) system using oxygen to produce ATP from carbohydrates and fats |
ATP-PCr and glycolytic systems producing ATP rapidly when demand is high |
|
Typical intensity |
Low to moderate, often 60–80% MHR, sometimes rising toward 70–85% MHR for stronger aerobic work |
High to maximal effort, often near or above anaerobic threshold, structured as intervals |
|
Typical duration |
Minutes to hours |
Seconds to about 1–2 minutes per work bouts |
|
Key fatigue limits |
Glycogen depletion, thermal stress, pacing errors, cardiovascular strain over time |
PCr depletion, metabolic fatigue linked with high-intensity glycolysis, neuromuscular fatigue |
|
Main adaptations |
Higher stroke volume, more capillaries, more mitochondria, improved VO₂ max and lactate threshold |
Greater ATP-PCr stores, improved buffering, increased Type II fibre contribution, improved neural recruitment, increased power and repeat sprint capacity |
|
Common methods |
|
|
|
Performance relevance |
Sustaining pace and recovering between efforts |
Explosive actions, accelerations and repeated high-intensity passages |
Brief Summary
About the dot point and how to approach it
- Aerobic training uses oxygen to produce ATP steadily for endurance and recovery between efforts.
- Anaerobic training supplies energy quickly via ATP-PCr and glycolytic systems for short, high-intensity work, developing speed, power, and tolerance to fatigue.
- To compare, place aerobic and anaerobic training side by side using the same points (intensity thresholds, work:rest patterns, energy systems, adaptations, and sport demands).
1. Training thresholds
- A training threshold/zone is an intensity where the body starts to respond in a specific way, leading to specific adaptations.
- MHR estimate: 220 − age, used to set heart rate zones.
- Aerobic work is commonly 60–80% MHR (harder aerobic often 70–85% MHR).
- Anaerobic threshold is usually around 85% MHR (varies by individual).
- Intensity checks also include RPE (0–10), repeated-effort quality, and the talk test (sentences = steady aerobic, short phrases = closer to threshold/above).
2. Aerobic training
- Sustained low to moderate intensity work where oxygen delivery matches demand and ATP production is mainly aerobic.
- Builds endurance and supports recovery between high-intensity efforts in many team sports.
- Key adaptations include increased stroke volume and cardiac output, increased capillary and mitochondrial density, improved lactate threshold and often VO₂ max.
- Common methods: continuous training, fartlek training, aerobic interval training (long intervals), and cardio-focused circuits.
3. Anaerobic training
- High-intensity bursts/intervals where ATP demand rises quickly, emphasising ATP-PCr and glycolytic (lactic acid) system.
- Improves speed, power, and repeat high-intensity capacity; work bouts are usually brief (often ≤ 1–2 minutes) with planned recovery.
- Key adaptations include increased ATP and PCr stores, improved anaerobic enzyme activity, improved buffering and fatigue tolerance, greater Type II fibre contribution, and improved neural recruitment.
- Common methods: anaerobic interval training (short, medium, long intervals), repeat sprints, resistance training, and plyometrics.
4. Comparing training for individuals and group sports
- Individual sports are more predictable, so training can match event demands closely (endurance = more aerobic and threshold work; sprint/power = more anaerobic power and recovery between maximal efforts).
- Group sports are intermittent, so athletes need both a strong aerobic base (total work rate and recovery) and high anaerobic capacity (bursts such as sprints, jumps, tackles, changes of direction).
- Positional demands change the balance of aerobic and anaerobic emphasis within the same sport.
5. Differentiated training programs
- A differentiated training program changes training variables so each athlete gets the right stimulus based on fitness, role, injury status, and season phase.
- Differentiation adjusts intensity (pace, heart rate zones, RPE), volume, work:rest ratios, mode (to manage load), and skill integration.
- Monitoring uses heart rate, session RPE, GPS metrics, and movement quality to match load and recovery.
6. Contemporary methods of training
- Time-efficient methods that can train multiple qualities and be differentiated by work time, rest time, intensity targets, and exercise choice.
- HIIT: repeated hard work with recovery (often 80–95% MHR), improving aerobic fitness (including VO₂ max) and repeat-effort tolerance.
- SIT: maximal or near-maximal sprints (typically ≤30 s) with longer recovery (often 2–4 min), targeting anaerobic power and also improving aerobic fitness due to high stress.
7. Comparison between aerobic and anaerobic training
- Key differences between aerobic and anaerobic sessions include work duration, rest, total workload, and how intensity is monitored.
- Aerobic sessions are commonly monitored with heart rate zones, while anaerobic sessions often rely on speed and RPE because heart rate lags during short maximal efforts.
- Balance matters: too much aerobic volume can reduce power if explosive work is neglected, while too much anaerobic intensity can reduce recovery if aerobic base is under-developed.
