Year 11 – Health and Movement Science

1.1 Compare meanings of health and explain why people give different meanings to health

About the dot point

Health does not have one fixed meaning. Instead, the meaning of health changes depending on the source used (including the World Health Organization’s (WHO) definition) and the focus of the definition, such as whether it prioritises disease, overall wellbeing, or health as something that supports everyday life. This matters because the meaning of health shapes what individuals and communities see as important, and what they think should be improved.

How to approach it

Because the dot point uses the directive verbs compare and explain, you must do two linked things. To compare meanings of health, place the different sources side by side and show both similarities and differences using the same points of comparison each time, rather than writing separate descriptions of each source. To explain why people give different meanings to health, show how and why factors such as context, lived experience, culture and age lead to different understandings of what it means to be healthy. Use cause and effect language in your sentences.

Health is not one fixed idea. What people mean by health can change across time, cultures and personal experiences. The definition you use affects what you focus on and what you think should be improved.

A narrow meaning of health often focuses on disease, diagnosis, and treatment. A broader meaning includes physical wellbeing, mental wellbeing, social wellbeing, daily functioning, relationships, and the conditions that help people live well. These differences matter because they influence health policy, health services, school programs, community programs, and personal health goals.

Health can also be described in two ways that do not always match.

  • Subjective health: how healthy you feel, and how well you think you are coping day to day.
  • Objective health: what can be observed or measured, such as test results, physical capacity, and diagnosed illness.

To compare meanings of health, focus on what each source includes, what it leaves out, and how it describes being healthy. Many definitions recognise the physical dimension, but they differ in how strongly they include mental wellbeing and social wellbeing, and whether health is an ideal state or something you use in everyday life.

An early and influential meaning of health comes from the biomedical model. In this approach, health is mainly seen as the absence of disease or injury. If there is no clear problem in the body, a person is labelled healthy.

This meaning can be useful because it is clear and measurable, which suits diagnosis and acute care. However, it can overlook:

  • mental wellbeing concerns (such as anxiety or depression)
  • social wellbeing issues (such as isolation, unsafe relationships, or exclusion)
  • day-to-day functioning and quality of life while living with a condition

A biomedical meaning can also treat health as a simple yes or no label, instead of recognising that people can live well while managing health issues.

The World Health Organization (WHO) broadened the meaning of health in 1948 by defining it as “a state of physical wellbeing, mental wellbeing and social wellbeing, not merely the absence of disease or infirmity“. This was important because it presented health as holistic, meaning multiple dimensions combine to shape overall health.

Compared with a biomedical meaning, the WHO definition:

  • clearly includes mental and social wellbeing
  • focuses on quality of life, not only disease
  • supports prevention and health promotion, not only treatment

A key criticism is the word complete wellbeing. This can sound like a perfect state that is unrealistic for most people most of the time. With a strict reading of complete wellbeing, even minor illness, stress, or relationship conflict could mean a person is not healthy.

The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion (1986) describes health as a resource for everyday life, rather than a perfect end-state. It states “Health is, therefore, seen as a resource for everyday life, not the objective of living. Health is a positive concept emphasizing social and personal resources, as well as physical capacities.” This shifts the focus from achieving perfect health to building the abilities and supports that help people live well.

Compared with the WHO wording, the Ottawa Charter is often seen as:

  • more realistic, because it recognises that life includes ups and downs
  • more inclusive, because it can recognise health even when illness or disability is present
  • more action-focused, because it points to the personal and social resources that strengthen health

This meaning links well with ideas such as resilience, health literacy, and support networks, because these help people respond to challenges and keep functioning.

An Australian public health perspective often builds on the WHO’s holistic approach and highlights that health is shaped by influences across a person’s life. This perspective emphasises that health is not only an individual issue. Health is also linked to the conditions that support wellbeing and participation.

The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) explains that “Health can be viewed as the presence or absence of disease or medically measured risk factors in an individual. However, more broadly, health is ‘a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity’ (WHO 1946). For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (First Nations) people and other diverse communities, health also includes cultural wellbeing (Department of Health 2021)”

Compared with biomedical meanings, an Australian public health perspective is more likely to emphasise:

  • living conditions (such as housing stability and neighbourhood safety)
  • access to services (such as GPs, mental health care, and culturally safe services)
  • resources and opportunities (such as education, income, and transport)
  • the role of the social determinants of health

This helps explain why health patterns are not evenly distributed across Australia, and why improving health often requires changes beyond individual behaviour.

People give different meanings to health because health is experienced and judged in context. Meanings can vary with a person’s age, gender, cultural background, and lived experience. Meanings also reflect what health needs to help a person do in daily life. This is why one person may define health as not being sick, while another focuses on coping well, feeling connected, or functioning independently.

Different meanings are also shaped by why the definition is being used. A clinical setting may prioritise diagnosis and disease, while health promotion and public health prioritise wellbeing, participation, and the conditions that help people live well.

Health is also relative. This means people compare health to what is typical for someone’s age and life stage, their goals, their circumstances, and their usual level of functioning. This helps explain why two people can see the same situation and still disagree about whether someone is healthy. Relative health is also shaped by what a person values. For some people, health means peak physical capacity and quick recovery. For others, health means being able to study, work, sleep, manage emotions, maintain relationships, and take part in community life, even when a condition is present.

A person’s meaning of health is shaped by experiences and environment.

Age and life stage

What health means to you changes as you grow older. A younger person might think health is about being fit and active, while an older person might focus more on staying independent and connected to others.

Gender and gender expectations

Society has different expectations for different genders, which shapes what people think health should look like. This means people might prioritise different aspects of health based on what they’re told is important for their gender.

Cultural background and community values

Your culture and community influence what you think matters most for health. Some cultures might emphasise physical fitness, others spiritual balance or family connections, and others the ability to give back to the community.

Lived experience

Your own experiences with illness, injury, disability, mental health challenges, or caring for others shape how you understand health. If you’ve lived through these things, you’re more likely to see health as practical and personal, not just about being perfectly well.

Personal goals and identity

What you want to achieve in life affects how you define health. An athlete might see health as performance and recovery, while someone else might see it as having energy for study, friendships, and feeling calm.

Social environment

Your relationships and surroundings shape your experience of health. Strong friendships and family support can make you feel mentally and socially healthy, while loneliness or conflict might make you feel unhealthy even if you’re physically fine.

Access to resources and services

Whether you can easily access healthcare, see a doctor, or find services that understand your background affects how you think about health. Limited access might make you focus more on avoiding illness than on improving overall wellbeing.

Health literacy and information exposure

What you learn from school, family, social media, and advertising shapes your understanding of health. Social media, for example, might promote narrow ideas about fitness or appearance that don’t include mental and social wellbeing.

Important to note:

When resources and supports are limited, people may define health in practical terms, such as getting through the day, feeling safe, attending school regularly, or keeping stable housing. When supports are strong, people may define health more broadly, including prevention and long-term wellbeing.

About the dot point and how to approach it

  • Health has no fixed meaning, and changes depending on the source and what it prioritises (for example disease, wellbeing, or everyday functioning).
  • To compare, show similarities and differences side by side using the same points of comparison.
  • To explain, link different meanings to context, lived experience, culture, age, and the purpose of the definition (clinical care versus health promotion).

1. Meanings of health

  • Meanings vary across time, cultures, jobs, and personal experiences, and shape what is seen as important to improve.
  • Meanings range from narrow (disease, diagnosis, treatment) to broad (physical wellbeing, mental wellbeing, social wellbeing, daily functioning, and living conditions).
  • Health can be subjective (how healthy someone feels) and objective (what can be measured or diagnosed), and these can differ.

2. Compare meanings of health across various sources

  • Definitions differ in what they include or leave out
  • Biomedical model: “absence of disease or injury”
  • World Health Organization (WHO): “a state of physical wellbeing, mental wellbeing and social wellbeing, not merely the absence of disease or infirmity
  • Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion (1986): “a resource for everyday life
  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW): Health can be measured by disease and risk factors, but broader health includes complete physical, mental and social wellbeing, and for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (First Nations) people also cultural wellbeing.

3. Why people give different meanings to health

  • Meanings vary by purpose, with clinical settings prioritising diagnosis and disease, and public health prioritising wellbeing, participation, and supportive conditions.
  • Meanings differ because health is experienced and judged in context, and depends on what health needs to help someone do in daily life.
  • Meanings are shaped by age, gender, culture, lived experience, values, and access to resources and services.