Year 12 – Health and Movement Science

5.3 Examine the role technology can play to improve performance

About the dot point

Technology in sport and physical activity includes the tools, systems, materials and digital platforms that help athletes and coaches improve how training is planned, how skills are refined, and how performance is managed over time. It matters because many key performance gains come from better feedback, greater precision in technique and training intensity, smarter workload management, and clearer recovery monitoring, rather than from training harder without direction. In practice, technology can shape performance through training innovations such as simulated environments, equipment advances that change efficiency and control, and monitoring systems that track technique, load and readiness so decisions are based on evidence rather than guesswork.

How to approach it

The directive verb in this dot point is examine, which means you need to look closely and carefully into how technology influences performance using relevant evidence and examples. Instead of simply naming devices, you should inquire into what the technology measures or changes, explain the cause-and-effect link to training or competition outcomes, and use specific examples to show what is significant about its impact, including any limits around validity, fairness, access and data use.

Technology refers to the tools, systems, materials and digital platforms used to improve training, analyse performance, and guide decisions. This includes hardware, such as wearables, GPS units, cameras and force-measuring devices, software, such as athlete management systems and video analysis platforms, and equipment advances, such as modern running shoes, improved track surfaces and assistive devices.

Technology is rarely useful as a single device on its own. Its value comes from how well it helps coaches and athletes collect information, interpret it, and act on it. A device may collect useful data, but performance only improves when that information leads to better training, better technique, better workload management or better decision-making.

Technology can improve performance in three broad ways. First, it can improve the quality of practice, so training becomes more specific, repeatable and targeted. Second, it can improve the equipment or environment in which performance occurs, making movement more economical, controlled or accessible. Third, it can improve recording and monitoring, so training load, technique and readiness can be tracked over time rather than guessed.

Technology does not improve performance automatically. It improves performance when it helps coaches and athletes make better decisions. This may involve changing a training drill, adjusting workload, improving technique, choosing more suitable equipment, or identifying fatigue before performance drops. It is most powerful when it makes training and feedback more individualised, rather than applying the same approach to every athlete regardless of their role, movement profile, fatigue level or performance goals.

Training innovations are new or improved ways of delivering practice so that athletes can learn, rehearse, adapt and perform more effectively. These innovations matter because they can improve the quality of training without always increasing the physical cost of training.

Virtual reality places the athlete inside a simulated environment. This allows them to rehearse situations that would otherwise be difficult to repeat often, safely or consistently in real training. VR is especially useful when the athlete needs to improve perception, anticipation, decision-making or tactical responses.

Because the environment can be controlled and repeated, athletes can face the same scenario multiple times and refine how they respond without the full physical demands of live play. This can make practice more targeted. The athlete can focus on reading cues, recognising patterns and making decisions under pressure, while the coach can control what is presented and how often it occurs.

VR is particularly valuable in sports where real-game repetition is limited by time, fatigue, injury risk or the availability of skilled opposition.

Augmented reality overlays information onto the real environment while the athlete is still performing the movement. This makes it useful when feedback needs to happen in context, not only afterwards. In training, AR can provide cues about pacing, positioning, movement timing or tactical decisions while the athlete is still engaged in the task.

AR can improve performance because it shortens the gap between error and correction. Instead of waiting until the end of a drill for feedback, the athlete can receive information during the action itself and adjust immediately. This can improve technique consistency, tactical awareness and the accuracy of movement execution.

Training innovations matter because they can improve the quality, specificity and efficiency of practice. They are most useful when they allow athletes to rehearse an important performance demand more clearly or more often than traditional methods alone.

They also support individualisation, because the scenario, cue, workload or feedback can be adjusted to the needs of a specific athlete rather than delivered in exactly the same way to the whole squad.

However, training innovations are not automatically better than traditional methods. The technology still has to match the skill or tactical problem being trained. If it is used only because it is new, rather than because it improves learning, decision-making or performance, the benefit will be limited.

Equipment advances improve performance when changes in design, materials or fit help the athlete move more efficiently, more safely or more effectively. The benefit may seem small in one movement, but across repeated steps, contacts, turns or strokes it can become highly significant.

Modern running shoes can affect performance through cushioning, stability, traction, comfort and, in some cases, energy return. The most important performance idea is that improved shoe design may reduce the energy cost of each stride or help maintain technique more effectively across long distances. If this happens, the athlete may be able to sustain pace more efficiently.

This is why running shoes are not just a comfort issue. In endurance performance, even a small improvement per stride can become meaningful across thousands of steps.

Track surfaces influence performance through traction, consistency and impact characteristics. A more consistent synthetic surface allows athletes to apply force more predictably than an uneven or weather-affected surface. This can improve speed, rhythm and confidence in movement execution.

Track surfaces can also affect how much stress is transferred through the body. A surface that is too hard may increase impact stress, while one that is too soft may reduce stability and increase muscular demand. This means the best surface is not simply the fastest-looking one, but one that supports efficient force application and repeatable performance.

Assistive devices improve both performance and access by reducing barriers to movement or sensory information. In performance settings, they can allow the athlete’s skill, decision-making and training to be expressed more effectively.

A lightweight sports wheelchair can improve acceleration and turning by improving stability and reducing unnecessary energy loss. An audible ball can support athletes with vision impairment by making ball position easier to detect through sound, allowing performance to depend more on movement skill and tactics than on sensory disadvantage.

Equipment advances matter because performance is shaped not only by the athlete, but also by the interaction between the athlete and the equipment or surface being used. Better equipment can improve efficiency, control, consistency and, in some cases, safety.

Equipment advances can also support greater individualisation, because equipment can be fitted, selected or adjusted to the needs of a particular athlete, event or role. However, better equipment does not automatically fix poor technique. Some sports also regulate equipment to protect fairness and integrity, especially when a design gives athletes an advantage that may go beyond normal performance improvement.

Recording and monitoring training and performance involves collecting information across time so that coaches and athletes can track what has been done, how the athlete is responding, and whether training needs to change. Performance improves when training becomes more measurable and more adjustable.

Monitoring allows coaches to look for trends, not just one-off results. This is important because one hard session or one poor night of sleep may not mean much on its own, but patterns across days and weeks can reveal whether the athlete is adapting well or beginning to struggle.

Monitoring is most useful when it supports individualised decisions. For instance, one athlete may need a lower training load, another may need a technique focus, and another may need extra recovery. Technology allows coaches to make these decisions with more evidence instead of treating the whole group in exactly the same way.

GPS is commonly used to record external load, meaning what the athlete physically did in the environment. This may include total distance, high-speed running distance, sprint efforts, accelerations, decelerations and peak speed.

In running-based sports, GPS helps coaches judge whether the weekly load matches the athlete’s role and whether sudden spikes are occurring. This matters because large, sudden increases in load can affect movement quality, fatigue and readiness to perform.

Sensor-enabled shoes and related movement sensors can provide technique-related information such as cadence, ground contact time and left-right symmetry. Their value is that they can reveal subtle changes in movement quality before performance decline becomes obvious.

Technique often changes when athletes are fatigued, compensating, or carrying a minor issue. If those changes are picked up early, training can be modified before the athlete loses more movement efficiency or develops a larger problem.

Video analysis and high-speed cameras improve performance by making movement easier to examine than it is in real time. Some technical errors happen too quickly for the coach or athlete to see accurately during the action itself. Slowing the movement down, replaying it, or comparing it side by side with previous attempts allows those details to become visible.

This is especially useful in sports with highly technical or fast movements, where small changes in timing, body position or sequencing can produce meaningful performance differences. Video analysis can therefore improve performance by making feedback more precise and by allowing athletes to connect what they felt with what actually happened.

Monitoring becomes more useful when data from different sources is brought together and used to guide decisions. Athlete management systems allow coaches and support staff to combine information such as GPS load, session ratings, soreness, sleep and readiness markers into one place so patterns can be interpreted more clearly.

This matters because performance is usually improved through consistency across weeks and months, not through one isolated session. Monitoring can improve performance by helping coaches:

  1. adjust training volume or intensity
  2. protect skill quality when fatigue is accumulating
  3. compare current performance to previous baselines
  4. plan recovery and return-to-performance more effectively

The purpose of monitoring technology is not just to collect numbers. Its value comes from showing patterns that help coaches and athletes make better decisions about training load, technique, recovery and readiness to perform.

Technology used

What it records or shows

What it may suggest

Why it matters for performance

GPS tracking

Total distance, high-speed running, sprint efforts, accelerations and decelerations

A sudden rise in external load

The athlete may struggle to maintain movement quality if the training load is not adjusted.

Wearable sleep tracker or athlete management system

Reduced sleep time, poorer sleep quality or repeated reports of tiredness

Poor recovery between sessions

Training quality, concentration and decision-making may decline if the athlete is not recovering properly.

Wellness app or daily athlete questionnaire

Higher soreness ratings, fatigue ratings or stress ratings

Accumulating fatigue or increased muscle soreness

The athlete may need modified training, extra recovery or closer monitoring before performance drops further.

Sensor-enabled shoes or movement sensors

Changes in cadence, ground contact time or left-right symmetry

Technique breakdown or compensation

Movement efficiency may decline before pain or injury becomes obvious.

Force plates, jump mats or power-measuring devices

Reduced jump height, lower power output or slower force production

Neuromuscular fatigue

Explosive performance may be reduced in training or competition.

Video analysis or high-speed cameras

Changes in timing, body position, sequencing or technique under fatigue

Technical errors that are difficult to see in real time

Coaches can give more precise feedback and target the specific movement issue affecting performance.

Technology can improve performance, but its effect depends on how well it is chosen, interpreted and used. The strongest programmes use technology to support judgement, not replace it.

Quality of information

A device may produce large amounts of data, but the information must still be valid, reliable and understood in context. If the data is inaccurate, inconsistent or poorly interpreted, it can lead to poor decisions.

Travel, illness, stress, weather and competition schedules can all affect results. This means technology should be interpreted alongside coaching knowledge, athlete feedback and the training context.

Fairness and access

Technology also raises issues of fairness and access. Advanced shoes, specialised surfaces, custom-fitted assistive devices and sophisticated monitoring systems are expensive. This means performance outcomes can sometimes reflect resource access as well as preparation and talent.

Many sports respond by regulating equipment or limiting the use of some technologies in competition. This helps protect the integrity of performance by making sure technology supports competition without completely changing what the sport is testing.

Privacy and data use

Monitoring technology can produce sensitive personal information about an athlete’s body, workload, recovery and readiness. Ethical use of monitoring requires clarity about who owns the data, who can access it, and how it is stored and protected.

Athletes should understand why information is being collected and how it will be used. Data should support athlete development and welfare, not simply create pressure or surveillance.

Technology dependence

Technology should support athlete awareness, not replace it completely. If an athlete relies on a device to tell them everything about effort, fatigue or readiness, they may become less skilled at interpreting their own body and performance.

The strongest use of technology combines data, coaching judgement and athlete self-awareness. This allows technology to guide decisions while still recognising that performance is affected by context, experience and the athlete’s own feedback.

Technology matters because it can make training more specific, equipment more effective, and performance management more precise. Training innovations can improve the quality of learning and decision-making. Equipment advances can improve efficiency, control and accessibility. Recording and monitoring can improve decisions about training, recovery and readiness.

Technology improves performance most clearly when it creates a useful chain of change:

  1. the technology collects, changes or enhances something important
  2. the coach or athlete uses that information or change to make a better decision
  3. training or performance becomes more targeted, efficient or consistent
  4. performance improves across time

About the dot point and how to approach it

  • Technology improves performance through better feedback, greater precision, smarter workload management, and clearer recovery monitoring.
  • Examine means looking closely into how technology influences performance using relevant evidence. It should be examined by explaining what it measures or changes, the cause-and-effect link to outcomes, and limits such as validity, fairness, access, and data use.

1. Technology and performance

  • Technology includes tools, systems, materials and digital platforms, including hardware, software, and equipment advances, and improves performance when it supports better decisions and individualised training.

2. Training innovations

  • Virtual reality supports perception, anticipation, decision-making, and tactical responses through controlled, repeatable scenarios.
  • Augmented reality overlays information during performance and shortens the gap between error and correction.
  • Training innovations improve the quality, specificity and efficiency of practice, especially when matched to the skill or tactical problem.

3. Equipment advances

  • Modern running shoes can improve running economy by reducing the energy cost of each stride and helping maintain technique.
  • Track surfaces affect traction, consistency and impact characteristics, shaping rhythm, force application, and stress on the body.
  • Assistive devices improve performance and access by reducing barriers to movement or sensory information.
  • Equipment advances can improve efficiency, control, consistency and safety, but may be regulated for fairness and integrity.

4. Recording and monitoring training and performance

  • GPS records external load and helps identify whether load matches role demands and whether sudden spikes are occurring.
  • Sensor-enabled shoes and movement sensors track cadence, ground contact time and symmetry to flag technique breakdown early.
  • Video analysis and high-speed cameras make timing, body position and sequencing visible for more precise feedback.
  • Athlete management systems combine data sources to show trends and guide planning across weeks and months.
  • Monitoring is valuable when it guides decisions about training load, technique, recovery and readiness to perform.

5. Using technology well

  • Technology should be valid, reliable and interpreted in context, alongside coaching knowledge and athlete feedback.
  • Technology can affect fairness and access, and sports may regulate equipment or limit some technologies.
  • Ethical use requires clarity about data ownership, access, storage and protection.
  • Avoid technology dependence by combining data, coaching judgement and athlete self-awareness.

6. Why technology matters for improved performance

  • Technology improves performance when it creates a chain of change from measurement or enhancement to better decisions, then more targeted training, then improved performance across time.