Year 12 – Health and Movement Science

3.1 Compare aspects that need to be considered when designing a training session for individual and group sports

About the dot point

A training session is a planned, structured period of practice designed to develop performance in a specific sport while reducing injury risk and supporting long-term athlete development. Effective session design brings together the sport’s physical, technical, tactical and psychological demands with the athlete’s current readiness, including fatigue, recovery, and any health or safety considerations, so the work completed is purposeful and appropriate for that day.

How to approach it

Because the directive verb in this dot point is compare, you must place training for individual sports and group sports side by side and show both similarities and differences using the same points of comparison each time. This means using consistent session elements, such as health and safety, the session aim, warm-up and cool-down, skill practice, conditioning, tactics, and evaluation, then explaining how each element is applied similarly and differently in each context, rather than writing two separate mini-essays.

Designing a training session means planning a structured period of practice. The goal is to improve performance, reduce injury risk, and support long-term development.

Good session design links:

  • the demands of the sport (physical, technical, tactical and psychological)
  • the athlete’s needs and readiness on the day
  • the purpose of the training program (for instance, pre-season fitness building versus in-season performance maintenance)

The same session elements are used in both individual sports and group sports, but they are applied differently. In individual sports, improvement focuses on one athlete’s execution and decisions. In group sports, coaches must also plan for team coordination, shared roles, and the fact that coaching time is spread across many athletes.

Health and safety considerations come first in session design because they link to duty of care. Duty of care means a coach has a legal requirement to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable harm. Safe planning supports consistent training, protects wellbeing, and lowers injury risk. It is most effective when it prevents both immediate problems (for instance collisions) and longer-term problems (for instance fatigue and overuse injuries).

Individual differences

Similarities

Group differences

  • The coach can complete a more detailed check of one athlete’s workload, technique, injury history and readiness.
  • Safety planning can be tailored to the athlete’s sport, event, equipment and training environment.
  • Equipment checks can be highly specific to the athlete, such as pole selection in pole vault or bike safety checks in cycling.
  • The coach can closely observe movement quality and adjust the session immediately if technique becomes unsafe.
  • If part of the programme involves training away from direct coach supervision, the coach should still plan safety controls such as route choice, visibility, communication and emergency procedures.
  • Risk management is more individualised because the coach is responsible for one athlete’s specific needs rather than a whole squad.
  • Safe facilities and equipment
  • Appropriate intensity for the athlete(s)
  • Clear supervision
  • Access to first aid and emergency procedures
  • Attendance, injury, illness and medical checks
  • Planning for heat, UV, storms, wet surfaces and poor air quality
  • Injury prevention through progressive overload, specificity and recovery
  • Safe technique during high-speed, high-force or high-impact movement
  • Greater risk because athletes share space
  • Coaches must manage positioning, movement and contact
  • Training areas need clear paths and safe equipment placement
  • Supervision is harder because attention is spread across the squad
  • Clear rules, rotations, contact limits and stop signals are needed
  • Training load checks must work efficiently for many athletes

The overview/aim of the session explains why the session is happening and how it will run. It gives the athlete(s) a clear purpose, helps them train at the right intensity, and makes “success” visible by clarifying the goal and the standard expected.

Individual differences

Similarities

Group differences

  • Aim is based on one athlete’s specific needs
  • Goals can be highly personal and changed quickly
  • Goals often use individual measures such as time, distance or accuracy
  • Coach can adjust the session immediately if readiness changes
  • Overview links the session to the broader training programme
  • Athletes understand what will happen and why
  • Includes attendance, injury or illness check
  • Includes recent performance information
  • Goals should be clear and measurable
  • Goals may target technique, physical qualities or tactical outcomes
  • Aim must bring the whole squad together
  • Goals are usually framed around shared team outcomes
  • Aims often focus on structure, tactics, cohesion or team fitness
  • Clear roles help each athlete understand success for their position
  • Flexibility is usually planned through stations, small groups or rotations

Warm-up and cool-down support safe, effective training. They improve readiness, movement quality, and recovery. The same principles apply in both individual and group sports, but delivery changes depending on whether the session involves one athlete or a group.

Individual differences

Similarities

Group differences

  • Warm-ups and cool-downs can be customised for one athlete
  • Can account for past injuries, movement restrictions and session demands
  • Coach can adjust immediately if the athlete seems stiff, sore or not ready
  • Cool-down can include focused mobility or rehabilitation exercises
  • Warm-ups should be progressive
  • General movement comes first
  • Mobility and activation follow
  • Sport-specific movements occur closer to the main session
  • Higher-intensity sessions need a more thorough warm-up
  • Warm-ups help identify readiness and movement quality
  • Cool-downs help gradually lower heart rate
  • Cool-downs include stretching, hydration and early recovery planning
  • Pain, tightness or injury signs should be checked
  • Warm-ups and cool-downs must suit different positions and abilities
  • Organisation, spacing and simple instructions are important
  • Consistent routines reduce crowding and inactive time
  • Cool-downs often include a team debrief
  • Individual recovery follow-up may need to occur outside the session

Skill instruction and practice are central to performance. This includes teaching technique and decision-making, then practising so skills can be executed under realistic conditions, including pressure, fatigue, and time constraints.

Individual differences

Similarities

Group differences

  • Instruction can be highly personalised
  • Feedback can be frequent and detailed
  • Technical adjustments can happen quickly
  • One skill can be practised for longer
  • Session can change immediately if technique drops or fatigue increases injury risk
  • Instruction should be brief, well timed and linked to the next action
  • Short cues are usually more effective than long explanations
  • Demonstration helps athletes understand timing and movement patterns
  • Feedback may include knowledge of performance
  • Feedback may include knowledge of results
  • Practice should move from simple to complex
  • Practice should progress from controlled drills to competition-like situations
  • Repetition and rest are needed to keep technique safe and effective
  • Instruction must be efficient for many athletes
  • Practice should keep athletes active and safe in shared space
  • Interaction, timing and communication become more important
  • Coach feedback is spread across the group
  • Stations, assistants and position groups can help organisation
  • Self-monitoring and peer cues become more important

Conditioning develops physical qualities that support performance, including aerobic capacity, strength, power and agility. Conditioning can be completed as a separate block (for instance intervals or gym work) or built into skill and game-based drills (for instance conditioned small-sided games).

In both contexts, conditioning should match the demands of the sport and the phase of the season. Conditioning design also needs to manage fatigue so technique and decision-making stay safe and effective.

Individual differences

Similarities

Group differences

  • Workload, rest and progression can be matched to one athlete
  • Conditioning can target specific event demands and weaknesses
  • Monitoring can be more detailed
  • Split times, heart rate, power and technique quality can guide adjustments
  • Coach can change the session immediately if fatigue affects movement quality
  • Conditioning can protect technique or deliberately train performance under fatigue
  • Conditioning reduces the effects of fatigue
  • It improves the ability to maintain intensity, repeat efforts or keep movement quality consistent
  • It should follow specificity
  • It should use progressive overload
  • It requires adequate recovery
  • Excessive fatigue can reduce movement quality and increase injury risk
  • Conditioning should match the phase of the season
  • Higher volume is more common in pre-season
  • In-season conditioning usually focuses more on maintenance and recovery management
  • Conditioning must suit different fitness levels and position needs
  • Often aims for a shared baseline with planned adjustments
  • Delivery may use group intervals, circuits or game-based conditioning
  • Monitoring must be efficient
  • Workload may be adjusted for return-to-play athletes or highly fatigued athletes
  • Conditioning can be integrated into drills to maintain engagement and reduce inactive time

Strategies and tactics training develops decision-making and the ability to apply a plan under pressure. It includes reading cues, selecting options, and adapting when conditions change.

Individual differences

Similarities

Group differences

  • Often focuses on self-management
  • May include pacing, effort distribution and risk control
  • In opponent sports, tactics may target an opponent’s weaknesses
  • Decision-making is usually made by one athlete in the moment
  • Success depends on recognising cues and performing consistently under pressure
  • Practice can be based on the athlete’s preferred patterns
  • Tactics can be adjusted quickly based on what the athlete finds difficult
  • Athletes need to understand the plan
  • Tactics should be practised in realistic situations
  • Coaches may use discussion, demonstration, video and scenario drills
  • Practice should include time pressure and realistic cues
  • Feedback should link decisions to outcomes
  • Tactics rely on coordinated action across many athletes
  • Success depends on shared structures and clear roles
  • Communication must be consistent
  • Teammates need to recognise the same cues
  • Opposed drills and conditioned games are often needed
  • Timing, spacing or communication errors can cause the tactic to fail

Athlete reflection and coach evaluation finish the session and support improvement. They should connect back to the overview/aim of the session and also consider safety, fatigue, and training load.

Individual differences

Similarities

Group differences

  • Reflection is often detailed and private
  • Athletes may use training logs, performance notes and video
  • Coach evaluation can be detailed because most attempts are observed
  • Results can be linked to specific technical and physical factors
  • Changes can be made quickly because they affect one athlete’s plan
  • Reflection should link back to the session goal
  • Evaluation should consider whether the goal was achieved
  • Evidence should support the evaluation
  • Coaches identify what should be reinforced next time
  • Coaches identify what should be adjusted
  • Wellbeing, injury and safety concerns need follow-up
  • Evaluation should consider goal achievement, load, safety, logistics and coaching effectiveness
  • Evaluation must balance whole-squad outcomes with individual needs
  • Team discussion can identify what improved and what needs work next session
  • Coach evaluation focuses on shared goals, communication, spacing and tactical execution
  • Individual follow-up is still needed for athletes with soreness, fatigue or return-to-play restrictions
  • Programme changes are less immediate because they may affect the whole squad
  • Targeted individual load adjustments may occur within the broader team plan

About the dot point and how to approach it

  • A training session is a planned, structured period of practice designed to develop performance while reducing injury risk and supporting long-term athlete development.
  • Effective session design brings together physical, technical, tactical and psychological demands with readiness, including fatigue, recovery, and health and safety considerations.
  • Because the directive verb is compare, training for individual sports and group sports must be placed side by side using the same points of comparison to show similarities and differences.

1. Designing a training session for individual and group sports

  • Designing a training session means planning a structured period of practice to improve performance, reduce injury risk, and support long-term development.
  • Good session design links the demands of the sport, the athlete’s needs and readiness on the day, and the purpose of the training program.
  • The same session elements are used in both individual and group sports, but they are applied differently.

2. Health and safety considerations

  • Health and safety considerations come first in session design because they link to duty of care.
  • Duty of care means a coach has a legal requirement to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable harm.
  • Individual sports: safety risks often come from workload, technique, and the training environment, especially when training happens with fewer people around.
  • Group sports: safety risks go up because athletes share space, so coaches manage interactions, positioning, and movement to prevent collisions and unsafe contact.

3. Overview/aim of the session (goal specific)

  • The overview/aim explains why the session is happening and how it will run, and clarifies the goal and standard expected.
  • Individual sports: the aim is built around one athlete’s needs and progress, and can be changed straight away if readiness changes.
  • Group sports: aims are framed around shared team outcomes, with clear roles and planned flexibility so the session can adapt without losing flow.

4. Warm-up and cool-down

  • Warm-up and cool-down support safe, effective training by improving readiness, movement quality, and recovery.
  • Individual sports: warm-ups and cool-downs can be customised and changed straight away based on the athlete’s readiness.
  • Group sports: warm-ups and cool-downs must work for different positions and abilities while keeping the group organised, active, and safe.

5. Skill instruction and practice

  • Instruction and practice teach technique and decision-making, then practise skills under realistic conditions, including pressure and fatigue.
  • Individual sports: instruction and feedback are personalised and frequent, allowing quick technical adjustments.
  • Group sports: instruction must be efficient, coaching time is spread across the group, and self-monitoring and structured peer cues become more important.

6. Conditioning

  • Conditioning develops physical qualities (including aerobic capacity, strength, power and agility) and must match sport demands and season phase.
  • Individual sports: conditioning is designed exactly for one athlete with detailed monitoring and immediate changes when fatigue affects movement quality.
  • Group sports: conditioning supports a squad with different needs using efficient monitoring and delivery (e.g. intervals, circuits, or game-based conditioning).

7. Strategies and tactics

  • Strategies and tactics training develops decision-making and the ability to apply a plan under pressure.
  • Individual sports: tactics focus on individual self-management (e.g. pacing, effort distribution, and risk control) and using an opponent’s weaknesses.
  • Group sports: tactics rely on coordinated action across many athletes with shared structures, clear roles, and consistent communication.

8. Athlete reflection and/or coach evaluation

  • Reflection and evaluation finish the session and connect back to the overview/aim of the session, plus safety, fatigue, and training load.
  • Individual sports: reflection and evaluation are often detailed and changes can be made quickly because they only affect one athlete’s plan.
  • Group sports: evaluation balances squad outcomes with targeted individual management.